Stablecoin balances have fallen sharply over the past ten days, offering a clear signal that capital is leaving the crypto market rather than rotating internally.
On-chain data from Santiment shows the combined market capitalization of the top 12 stablecoins declined by roughly $2.24 billion over that period, tracking Bitcoin’s slide from around $95,000 to the high-$88,000 range, according to CoinGecko.
Bitcoin rebounded modestly on the day, rising about 1.4% to $88,500, but remains down more than 4% over the past week. The price action has been notably flat, with no sustained follow-through on either side, even as liquidity continues to drain. Under normal conditions, selling pressure in Bitcoin or altcoins tends to recycle capital into stablecoins as traders wait for better entries.
This time, that pattern has broken.
Derivatives markets reflect caution
Santiment noted that falling stablecoin supply suggests investors are exiting to fiat instead of positioning to buy dips, a shift that often appears during periods of heightened uncertainty or declining risk appetite.
The same hesitation is visible in derivatives positioning. Bitcoin’s aggregated open interest has remained stuck in a narrow range for weeks, oscillating between roughly 245,000 and 267,000 BTC, according to data from Velo.
The lack of expansion in open positions suggests traders are reluctant to deploy fresh leverage, reinforcing the view that capital is stepping back rather than rotating aggressively within the market.
This stasis stands out given Bitcoin’s historical tendency to attract speculative positioning during volatility. Instead, both spot and derivatives data point to a market that is defensive, waiting, and increasingly selective.
Macro stress and the pull of gold
The backdrop for these outflows is largely macro-driven. Bitcoin has historically struggled to attract inflows during periods of geopolitical tension, policy uncertainty, or broader economic stress. That behavior has resurfaced following the October all-time high, as shifting global dynamics and policy signals weighed on risk assets.
Jordan Jefferson, founder of the Dogecoin app layer DogeOS, previously described this pattern as a recurring feature of Bitcoin’s market structure. During uncertain macro phases, capital tends to retreat rather than seek opportunistic entries, especially when volatility remains elevated.
At the same time, gold has reasserted itself as the preferred refuge. Prices climbed to a new record near $5,100 per ounce this week, reflecting steady demand for assets perceived as stable and time-tested. Tim Sun, senior researcher at HashKey Group, pointed to gold’s long history and lower volatility as decisive advantages during periods of stress.
Bitcoin, by contrast, remains sidelined.
Its price swings make it harder to absorb large safe-haven flows, particularly from investors prioritizing capital preservation over upside optionality. Sun also noted a demographic dimension: much of global wealth is held by investors over 50, many of whom have seen gold perform reliably through multiple crises. For that cohort, Bitcoin is still often viewed as a speculative technology asset rather than a store of value.
Liquidity drains, not panic
Taken together, shrinking stablecoin supply, stagnant derivatives positioning, and muted price action suggest a market undergoing quiet deleveraging rather than outright capitulation. Capital is leaving the crypto ecosystem, but without the disorderly selling that typically marks panic phases.
For now, Bitcoin’s flat trading range reflects that balance. Investors appear unwilling to chase risk higher, yet equally hesitant to force exits at current levels, leaving the market in a holding pattern shaped more by macro forces than internal crypto dynamics.
Gunel Ismayilova
Disclaimer: All materials on this site are for informational purposes only. None of the material should be interpreted as investment advice. Please note that despite the nature of much of the material created and hosted on this website, HODL FM is not a financial reference resource, and the opinions of authors and other contributors are their own and should not be taken as financial advice. If you require advice, HODL FM strongly recommends contacting a qualified industry professional.
